@elgreg haha

@elgreg Aw shucks, I missed it. Can you bring the site down again in 10 minutes so I can take a gander?

@chriscoyier More complicated to set-up, but easier to scale to larger volumes of traffic.

@chriscoyier I hear ya. Different URLs are icky but the JS would handle redirecting people to the right one.

@chriscoyier like xl.example.com or s.example.com that would cache much better and accomplish the same thing.

@chriscoyier I was thinking about this some more and if you needed to scale you could redirect to a different sub domain…

@brownpau were you participating in a 36-hour karaoke marathon? That sounds like a Filipino thing

@chriscoyier the tricky thing with all of this is server side caching becomes much more difficult since its based on a cookie value

@chriscoyier went to the address bar then hit enter and then I got the small screen message as expected.

@chriscoyier visited page in mobile Chrome and got the large screen. Refreshed the page. Still the large screen.

@cdharrison “he’s my friend and a while lot more”

@JessSchillinger @mr_suh i.imgur.com/abauVXq.gif

@jessschillinger No problem. That’s what we did at PRC.

@jessschillinger Correct! Creating a new site is just as easy as publishing a new blog site.

@kimmelpalooza How’s the babby?

@kimmelpalooza I know… weird right?

@taupecat what happens?

@mr_suh once upon a time a little turtle went to sleep. The End.

@kathkat15 does it taste better at 30?

@jgarber You would probably use reactive-bootstrap-angularmber.js with 3 way data binding and ES6 shims.